Turkic and Mongolian peoples of Russia. Turkic and Mongolian peoples of Russia Legislative body of the Turkic peoples

Turkic-Mongolian symbiosis

The best option for ethnic contact is symbiosis, when ethnic groups live side by side and apart, maintaining peaceful relations, but not interfering in each other's affairs.

L.N. Gumilyov

When studying the historiography of the Turkic and Mongolian peoples, first of all, the commonality of plot-thematic traditions of life and way of life of nomadic tribes is striking.

Rashid ad-Din, the first European travelers and subsequent researchers all note the similarity of the social and living conditions of the nomads of the Great Steppe. And this is natural and natural, since almost the same natural and climatic conditions for centuries and millennia have developed similar skills among nomads to adapt to living conditions. Peaceful migrations of nomads and military clashes between tribes contributed to the interpenetration of customs, traditions and ways of housekeeping and life. Professor E.S. Omarov notes: "The mutual penetration and mutual enrichment of the cultures of various tribes and peoples was the main line of the world process."

The tribes of nomads who settled the Great Steppe, as a result of constant contacts among themselves over the centuries, developed a single and material culture. And since this is possible only when people speak one language, or at least speak close, mutually intelligible languages, then throughout this vast territory there should have been a single language or, say, dialects of a closely related language. This root unity has been preserved in the Turkic languages ​​to the present day.

The history of nomadic peoples is somewhat similar to a deck of cards, where the trump card changes. Among the Turkic peoples in each era, some tribe dominated a certain territory (Scythians, Alans, Huns, Ases, Bulgarians, Khazars, Pechenegs, Polovtsy, Tatars, etc.). But this whole deck was constantly mixed up, no one disappeared anywhere, the trump card, the leader, changed. All these Turkic peoples, roaming the boundless steppes of Eurasia from the mouth of the Danube to Manchuria, professed Tengrianism.

The same idea was expressed by the outstanding sinologist N.Ya. Bichurin: “On the entire strip of Central Asia from the Eastern Ocean to the Caspian Sea in the west, he wrote, from time immemorial lived the same peoples who now inhabit this country; led the same way of life that their descendants lead after 2 thousand years, were within the same limits in which the latter still live with a slight change in space.

“Like meteors, nomadic empires appeared and disappeared, their ethnic names changed (Scythians, Saks, Huns, Avars, Bulgars, Khazars, Savirs, Polovtsy, Pechenegs, Tatars), but with a change in name, the language of the ancient nomads did not change, like life, so is the way of life, and the ethnic character and culture” [ibid., p. 57].

And then the same author, analyzing the centuries-old history, comes to the conclusion: “In the era of the Mamluks, the Turkic languages ​​were practically the same, with the exception of small dialect deviations, which is confirmed by the data of the dictionary of Mahmud of Kashgar. This linguistic unity was preserved until the 20th century. For many centuries, various associations of Turkic peoples dominated the steppes of Eurasia: the Empire of Atilla, the Avar Khaganate, the Turkic Khaganates, Great Bulgaria, the Khazar Khaganate, the Pecheneg Horde, the Polovtsy, the Golden Horde. As noted above, with the change of the ethnonym (the name of the tribal association), the language did not change. .

The ethnogenesis of the nomads also appears to be a process of interpenetration and merging, both of the ancient Huns, Scythians, and subsequent Ugric, Samoyedic, Turkic, Mongol tribes and nationalities. “Modern ethnologists, for example, in the formation of Siberian tribes (Tatars of Tartar, Tobolsk, Tomsk, Ishim, Tyumen, Baraba, etc.) identify more than twenty components that connect Siberian Tatars with almost 30 ethnic groups of the former USSR, including and with the Kazakhs” [according to I.V. Erofeeva.

The technology of making felt carpets and other felt products with traditional ornaments and the same appliqué is still used by the Turkic and Mongol-Oirat peoples, being part of the culture and life of these peoples and constituting their specific distinctive feature.

Thus, we see that the Turkic branch of the Turan-Altaians was united in ancient times - language, customs, culture, biological origin.

The place of their permanent residence, was and is now, the territory from the Pacific Ocean in the east to the Balkan Mountains in the west, from Siberia and the tundra in the north, to Tibet and the Iranian Highlands in the south - at present, about 50 Turkic-speaking nationalities, which include in their total mass about 100 well-known Turkic tribes and at least 1000 clans that make them up.

Since ancient times, each Kazakh family has its own distinctive family sign - tamga, which is used for its intended purpose only by legitimate heirs-carriers. For example, among the Zhalair tribe, such a tribal coat of arms is “tarak” (“Comb” or “Trident” in the form of the letter “Sh”). The same sign is a tamga for the Tarakty clan of the Argyn tribe, for the Tama tribe and for the Tabyn tribe. And what, most importantly, is the absolute coat of arms of the Chingizid family - the tore (the descendants of Genghis Khan, and there are thousands of them in Kazakhstan). A similar coat of arms ("trident") was also at the Kyiv prince Svyatoslav.

The well-known Arab chronicler Ibn Fadlallah al-Umari (he served as secretary to the Egyptian Sultan al-Malik al-Nasir, died in Damascus in 749 AH (1348–1349) wrote about the Turkic-Mongolian symbiosis of the 13th century that took place in the Great Steppe as follows: "In ancient times, this state was the country of the Kipchaks, but when the Tatars took possession of it, the Kipchaks became their subjects. Then they (Tatars) mixed and intermarried with them (Kipchaks), and the land prevailed over the natural and racial qualities of them (Tatars ), and they all became exactly Kipchaks, as if from the same (with them) clan, because the Mongols (and Tatars) settled on their land (Kipchaks). Thus, a long stay in any country and land makes human nature to become like her and change her innate traits according to her nature.

The Kipchaks, even after becoming part of the Jochi ulus, also continued to be called for some time, until their bulk began to be called Tatars.

It should also be borne in mind that the Tatars living in the Volga region have nothing to do with the Mongols of Genghis Khan. So say the Tatars from Kazan.

While in Kazan, I heard a similar statement from historians more than once. It is doubtful to take this version as an axiom. There are many questions. Everywhere, wherever the Tatars live, they speak in their own way, in Tatar. It must be assumed that in Mongolia during the time of Genghis Khan, the Tatars spoke their own Tatar language. But many researchers argue that - no, the Tatars in Mongolia spoke Mongolian.

Actually, this book of mine is built to prove, with the help of historians from different countries, peoples and times, to give convincing arguments and facts that the Turkic-Tatar or Turkic-Mongolian symbiosis existed both in the era of Genghis Khan and before him, so after. Only, as Academician of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan M.A. Usmanov: "There is no need to rush to throw this book away." After reading the entire book, I hope and believe that many will agree with me. Painfully weighty arguments are presented to the readers.

First, some food for thought.

When the corps of Subedei and Jebe crossed the Caucasian ridge, went to the North Caucasian steppe, he met Alans and Polovtsy-Kipchaks there (1222). The Arab chronicler Ibn al-Athir, a contemporary of the Mongol conquests, narrates about these events as follows: “They (Alans) used all their efforts, gathered a group of Kipchaks and fought with them (Tatars). Neither side prevailed over the other. Then the Tatars sent to the Kipchaks to say: We and you are of the same kind and these Alans are not of yours, so you have nothing to help them; your faith is not like their faith, and we promise you that we will not attack you, but we will bring you money and clothes, as much as you want; leave us with them." In the end, the Mongols defeated the Alans, and then the Kipchaks separately. For us, the interest lies in something else: how the Mongols, having met the Kipchaks for the first time, spoke the same language with them, that they both understood each other.

"We and you are of the same kind." And there are five thousand kilometers between Mongolia and the North Caucasus! The fact that the Kipchaks are a Turkic people, I hope, no one will dispute. The Mongols of Genghis Khan spoke the same language with them. They understood each other without intermediaries.

Consider some common elements from the ethnos of the Kazakhs and the Volga Kalmyks, which will give us certain judgments about the Turkic-speaking and Mongol-speaking peoples of Eurasia.

In numerous research work scientists from Mongolia and Kalmykia considered in detail and in detail the issue of the origin of the Dzungar tribes and their connection with neighboring tribes.

According to the Secret History of the Mongols (1240), the founders of all Mongolian clans were Duva-Sohor and his younger brother Dobun-Mergen [§ 3, translation by S.A. Kozina, 1941]. Duva-Sohor had 4 sons who became the founders of the Dorben-irgen tribes (Oirats). They lived west of the lake. Baikal. During the time of Genghis Khan, the Oirats did not play any active role in the formation of the Mongolian nation. But later, from the end of the XIV century, they declared themselves in full voice and became active participants in all political events both in Mongolia and in the surrounding territories. However, the Ming Chinese pushed the Oirats to the west outside the national territory. The Oirats, like other related Mongolian tribes, adopted Buddhism at the end of the 16th century. The center of their religious teachings is Tibet.

In 1618, the leader of the Torgauts, Ho-Urlyuk, separated from the Oirat union and moved westward with his subjects through the northern and central Kazakh steppes to the lower reaches of the Yaik and Volga. So, in the first decades of the 17th century, the Kalmyk Khanate was formed as part of the Russian Empire. Its main composition was the Oirat tribes of the Torgauts and parts of the Derbets and Khoshauts.

Abulgazy - Khan of Khiva (1643-1664), Chingizid, in his book "Genealogy of the Turks", reports curious information about his stay with the Kalmyks: "(1639) ... the Turkmens of Mangyshlak deteriorated. After much deliberation, they decided to submit to the Kalmyks. The Kalmyk king, having heard about my arrival, sent the best people meet me, protect me for one year and send me to my people, who were at that time in Urgench. And regarding the Kalmyks themselves, after his conversations with them and personal observations, Abulgazy wrote: “Oirats, Torgauts, Horm-Tumats, etc. are Turkic tribes from the Kiyat clan” [ibid.].

Abulgazy Khan was a brilliantly educated man of his time. In his youth, he studied the Persian, Arabic, Chagatai literary languages, refused to rule the khanate in favor of his son Anush-Mohammed, and he himself took up the compilation of genealogies. Abulgazy spoke with the Kalmyks in their native Turkic dialect, about which he shared his impressions. This is very important note Khiva Khan, as an eyewitness - the Kalmyks, i.e. Oirats, immigrants from western Mongolia, spoke the Turkic language. Consequently, the rest of the Mongols of the time of Genghis Khan were Turkic-speaking. Further this important information I will try to expand, deepen and convince inquisitive readers of this. Of course, I am aware that my conviction will be met with hostility by some historians in a certain way, or even considered heresy, nonsense of an amateur, etc., etc. Well, this is their opinion, I have it different. Very often people cannot be persuaded. It remains only to wait. Let's hope that new approaches will not exclude other opinions that contribute to clarifying the truth of the essence of the issue.

A similar opinion was expressed by the historian V.A. Moiseev: “By the mid-forties of the 18th century, peaceful, and even to some extent, friendly relations were established between the Dzungar Khanate, on the one hand, and the Middle and Younger Zhuzs, on the other. The Kazakhs, who came to the Semipalatinsk fortress on trading business, told Russian officials that now they are with the Oirats "in the world, and, hunting animals in the steppe, with these Kalmaks come together with each other."

This is how ordinary Kazakhs communicate freely with Kalmyks at home and on the hunt without interpreters, understanding each other. And then the historian confirms his idea with the words of an eyewitness: “Tokmo-de, the children of Ablai-Sultan and Barak-Sultan come to the Horde to their owner Galdan-Chirin with light yurts and live for a month and two, and walk with Galdan children and are de at Galdan-Chirin in favor” [ibid.].

The struggle of opposites in science - normal phenomenon. Truth is revealed in discussions. The source of development of any system is the interaction of opposites. "The way to the essence lies through the court, through the tribunal of thought that constantly sits in you."

This version has been known to historians for 150 years since its publication by Academician V.P. Vasiliev. I only give new, as I see it, convincing confirmation of the version expressed by him. Numerous facts confirm this conclusion - the Mongols of Genghis Khan were Turkic-speaking.

I ask scientists: what language did the Dzungars speak?

- Of course, in their own, Mongolian.

– And how did they communicate with the Kazakhs?

- They were bilingual.

Maybe. However, we will collect new facts in favor of the chosen version. One of the first researchers of Kazakh life, Captain I.G. Andreev wrote that “after 1771, the Kalmyks who were captured by the Kazakhs, among the Kyrgyz, for the most part live freely, like the natural Kyrgyz, with their nomads, and, having freedom in everything, constitute a mixed homogeneity” . In another place, Andreev cites another similar fact: “Tok-sultan, the son of Abylai Khan, sends his kegey Tanyuchi Teldaev to Semipalatinsk with a letter, who was with him, Tok, in 1785 in St. Petersburg. This Tanyucha Teldaev from the Kalmyks of the Volga, was taken prisoner in 1771. They have nomad camps near the Chingistau stone. As you can see - normal trusting friendships.

And here is how Kalmyk diplomats said in 1771 during their transition to Dzungaria through the Kazakh steppes: “Kazakhs and Kalmyks have been kindred peoples since ancient times, it makes no sense for us to continue to fight ... We propose to restore ancient family customs.”

What kind of related customs do the Kalmyks talk about? Let's try to explain.

Kalmyk researcher A.G. Mitirov in his works cites a letter from the Kazakh Khan Abylay, written in Tatar (read, in Kazakh, A.O.) to Darma-Bale (the widow of the Kalmyk Khan Tseren-Dunduk, sister of Galden-Tseren): “I, Ablai Sultan, I wish you good health and all our subjects bow to you. I declare to you about myself that I have been freed from Galdan-Cheren's hands in good health and with honor and have come to the house. Galdan-Cheren has me for his son, and your nephew Septen has for his younger brother. And I call you a younger brother. Abylai Khan wrote in his own way, in Kazakh, and was sure that he would be understood.

Kalmyk historian U.E. Erdniev writes that the Kereites are nomadic tribes defeated by Genghis Khan in the first decade of the 13th century. on the territory of Mongolia (every schoolboy probably knows about this fact), turned out to be scattered over the vast expanse of Central Asia, Southern Siberia and Kazakhstan, and became part of the ethnic composition of the Kalmyk and Kazakh peoples. And nowhere did they experience any special harassment. Nomadism, as a way of life, was the same throughout the Steppe.

Another researcher Ts.D. Namankhanov reports on Kalmyks of Kazakh origin who are integral part ethnic group of the Kalmyk people.

Kazakh researcher G.K. Konkashpaev writes about the stay of the Kalmyks (Dzhungars) on Kazakh territory: “In some areas they lived longer, in others less; in general, their habitation lasts from one hundred to one hundred and seventy years, and maybe more.

In what language did they (Kazakhs and Kalmyks) communicate with each other? After all, they had to sort things out a thousand times in a neighborly way at the household level. Their main contradictions, of course, were: the capture of the best pastures during migration and questions of religion.

To develop the topic under consideration, attention should be paid to the following fact: in early September 1640, an all-Mongolian congress of sovereign princes gathered near the Tarbagatai Mountains, which brought together all representatives of the Mongolian and Oirat lands, with the exception of the principalities of Inner and Eastern Mongolia, which was under the rule of the Manchu conquerors. The congress participants solemnly vowed: “We will not sow discord, acting through natural Mongols. We will not keep people of the same clan-tribe with us, even if they become impoverished and become serfs (Albatu), we will not keep in the service for menial work and give them as dowries for our daughters ... We will not sow discord and give them (in property) to people of a different clan tribes... Let's not shed their blood... Not only we, but also our descendants from generation to generation, let us not do evil to each other.

The well-known Mongolist N. N. Pope, speaking about the significance of this historical document, called it “the first in the history of not only the Mongols and Kalmyks, but in general the first in the history of the peoples of the whole world, a non-aggression pact and the punishment of aggression” [from the materials of the Kalmyk historian V .P. Sanchirova, No. 110, p. 187].

From the above text it is clearly visible that all the Dzungars (Oirats) call themselves Mongols, and regret that Inner and Eastern Mongolia is under the occupation of the Manchus, where a new community of people is being formed, who will later call themselves Khalkha Mongols. And the neighboring peoples - the Kazakhs and the Kirghiz are called "people of the same blood with us."

Historian-researcher V.A. Moiseev in his article “On the issue of Oirat-Kazakh relations in 30–40 years. 18th century." (1980) in one paragraph reveals the essence of the policy of the Western Mongols (Dzungars): “ The main task The foreign policy of the Dzungar khans, starting with Batur-khuntaiji (1635-1654) and ending with Galden-Tseren (1727-1745), was the unification under their auspices of the entire Mongolian world and the re-creation of a new powerful nomadic state. The shadow of a great empire - pointed out academician N.I. Konrad, - hovered for a long time before the mental gaze of the Mongol khans. However, the Manchu Qing dynasty, which reigned in China in 1644, stood in the way of this plan, because the strengthening of Mongolia meant the inevitable fall of its dominance. Hence the fierce struggle between the Qing Empire and the Dzungar Khanate for many decades. After the annexation of Khalkha by the Qingami, the capture of Tibet, Kukunor, it became obvious to the Dzungar feudal lords that the forces of the Oirats were clearly not enough not only to unite the Mongol world, but also to successfully continue the further struggle against the Manchu-Chinese conquerors. Therefore, the spearhead of their military-political activity is turning to the west ... hatching plans for the creation of a united now Mongolian-Turkic state.

For here, in the west, lived kindred Turkic tribes.

Alas! History decreed somewhat differently. The greed and internecine enmity of their leaders will destroy the Dzungars. In 87 years they will attack the Kazakhs. They will reach Ishim and Tobol (1723 - "Aktaban - Shubyryndy"). And in 118 years they will disappear altogether from the political map of the world. Eastern Mongolia, on the contrary, with a new people and language, a new religion and a new script, will be preserved. And he will honor and remember his former greatness and the accomplishments of Genghis Khan.

Researchers of the Dzungarian legal codes “Ikh Tsaaz” and the Kazakh “Jeti Zhargy” drew attention to many similar rules for punishing criminal offenses, the amount of compensation for damages and types of fines, as well as the similarity of everyday rituals, such as matchmaking and weddings. The solution of the most important issues, such as the conduct of hostilities and land use, the choice of a nomadic place for both, was decided at congresses (kurultais). The concept of "Tengri" - the highest spirit, is the same for these two peoples.

At the household level, the theme "Kazakh batyr and Kalmyk girl" was widespread in the Kazakh folk epic. These are, first of all, the famous lyrical poem "Kyz Zhibek", the poem of the writer M. Zhumabaev "Batyr Bayan", the poem by S. Seifullin "Kokshetau". And what is the wish of the people’s sage Bukhar-Zhirau to the strong half of his people: “Let a Kalmyk woman be your wife!” . Comments, as they say, are unnecessary here.

“Kalmyk fairy tales have much in common with the fairy tale works of the Kazakh people” - this is from the dissertation of V.T. Sarangova (1998).

A somewhat unusual fact is noted in Russian sources, where in the reports of the Russian envoy Maksud Yunusov to the Collegium of Foreign Affairs it is reported that the Kalmyk hero Ushun, a relative of Ayuk Khan, helped Abulkhair Khan to liberate the city of Tashkent and Turkestan from the Jungars in 1724. Researcher of Kazakh-Dzungarian relations S.A. Edilkhanova, based on Kalmyk sources, gives an example of friendship between the Kazakh Zhangir Khan and the Kalmyk Kundulen-Taisha. The topic touched upon is available in the works of M. Tynyshpaev and A. Seidembek. It is known from sources that in 1741 the Dzungarian Galden-Tseren sent his embassy to the Khan of the Younger Zhuz Abulkhair with a proposal to marry the daughter of the Khan to his son-heir.

In peacetime, Kazakhs and Dzungars coexisted peacefully, successfully traded, exchanging their goods. The famous Kazakh scientist-historian R.B. Suleimenov wrote: “Of course, the history of relations between the Oirats and the Kazakhs was not always idyllicly peaceful, between them, as mentioned above, fierce bloody wars often broke out for pastures, for dominance over trade routes and markets. But why look for enmity there and then, where and when it did not exist.

“The kinship between Kazakhs and Kalmyks is sung in the Kalmyk folk epic song “Who did you leave us for”, dedicated to Khan Ubashi: “Are the expanses of Naryn - sands not suitable for autumn nomads? Or did they not count the neighboring Kazakh tribes as their relatives? .

“At the end of 1723, the Wise Tolebi personally visited Dzungaria at the head of the Kazakh embassy. During a reception with Khuntai shi Tseren Rabdan, speaking about the purpose of his visit, he uttered only a few words: “Aza? – kalmak emes pe?”, which in direct translation meant: “Are not the Kazakhs and Dzhungars twin brothers?”. Tolebi convinced the Khuntaiji that two blood-related peoples were exterminating each other for the sake of a neighboring empire alien to them by blood and traditions. These words deeply touched Ts. Rabdan. He got up from the throne and said that today he would release all the Kazakh hostages. Armor, weapons and horses will be returned to them. From his herd, he gave Tolebi a thousand horses. Two more years after the visit of Tole bi, the war continued with obvious success for the Dzungars. Here, the main thing for us is that the Kazakhs and Dzungars (Western Mongols) freely communicated with each other, that they understood each other perfectly! It turns out that the root of their colloquial speech is one - Turkic.

In May 1732, Kalmyk envoys from Dorji Nazarov and his son Lubzha arrived at Abulkhair Khan's headquarters, "used all their eloquence" to convince the Kazakhs to oppose the Russian troops. I wonder how to more convincingly express your eloquence in front of an interlocutor, if you speak a foreign language? The translator may not translate so gracefully. “And Abulkhair understood that the Kalmyks shamelessly lied” [ibid.].

Or here is another, almost similar, case of the use of the spoken language between Kazakhs and Kalmyks. “Ablai offered noble Dzhungar guests the place of rulers in the Kazakh uluses: Davatsi - in the Basentiin clan, Amursan - in the Uak-Kereys, and Banjuru - in the Naiman tribe." Understanding that this is a purely diplomatic trick of Ablai, let's try to comprehend how the Dzungars, foreigners who speak the Mongolian language, will control the Kazakhs? Incredible case. Most likely, the Dzungarian guests knew the Kazakh language if they were looking for a reliable shelter from the Kazakhs.

In the history of relations between the Kazakhs and the Kalmaks (Oirats), there was a case of the opposite nature, when the Kazakhs ruled the Kalmaks. In 1594, in Moscow, the Kazakh embassy of Tavakkul Khan stated that he “became a member of the Cossack horde, and planted his brother Shah-mamet-tsarevich on Kalmaks, and they roam de pobliska and everything is in unity ...” . Consequently, as a result of military clashes and defeats, the Oirats in this moment were forced to recognize the power of the Kazakh khans. Obviously - the language barrier between them did not exist.

Historian Zlatkin I.Ya. - one of the best researchers in the history of the Dzungar Khanate, in his book mentions the origin of the Torgaut tribe from the Kereites of Van Khan, and he traces the founder of the Khura-Khula Khanate to the Choros - one of the tribes of Mogolistan.

The Dzungarian Khuntaiji Galden Tseren wrote to Khan Abulkhair: “We de Kalmyks and Kaisaks together are hawks, and before one crow (the Russian Empress) we will not kneel, because they are carts, and we are Uzbeks” . That's who they are - Uzbeks! This is said by the most important leader of the Dzungars, Galden Tseren, a representative of the Western Mongols. He confirms that they, the Dzungars, come from Turkic tribes. In my opinion - convincingly, the most authoritative first-hand source.

Historian writer Radik Temirgaliev rightly concludes: “The slogan of nomadic unity was close to many Kazakhs and Oirats. The era of Genghis Khan and his successors seemed to the nomads a "golden age", when the Turks and Mongols, thanks to their unity, ruled the world. It was this idea that reconciled the Dzhungars and the Kazakhs.

Researcher S.A. Edilkhanova sums it up as follows: “The term “Turkic-Mongolian symbiosis” has long taken its special place in history. The common ancestors of the Kazakhs and the Dzungars are the Huns, the Kidans, the Kereites and other tribes. From the depths of centuries, the historical and cultural ties of the Turkic-Mongolian peoples have come down to us, one of the branches of which are the Kazakhs, and the other - the Dzungars (Oirats) ".

Another Kazakh researcher A.Sh. Kadyrbaev in his work summarizes the conditions for the formation of various ethnic groups: “Modern peoples, and the history of the Kazakhs and Mongols is a clear confirmation of this, developed on the basis of a mixture of different tribes and nationalities, moreover, the same ethnic components, although in unequal proportions, participated in the formation Turkic and Mongolian peoples, which rejects theories of "racial purity", national exclusivity of "any kind of peoples" .

The above facts of the relationship between the Kazakhs and the Dzungars are given here with one purpose, to convince curious readers that the Kazakhs and Dzungars, in their close communication at all levels, spoke each in their own way - in the Kazakh and Kalmyk languages, but mutually intelligible to them, since they had many related common words on a Turkic basis. The modern Khalkha-Mongolian language has only a small percentage of words in common with the Turkic languages.

The secretary of the Egyptian sultan al Malik az-Zahir Baybarsa named Ibn-Abu-az-Zahir (died in 1293) wrote about the correspondence of his sultan, the famous Baybars, with the king of the Golden Horde Berke, and Desht-i Kipchak always calls the nomads Tatars . He describes the arrival of Egyptian ambassadors to King Berke (1264) as follows: “The chief qadi (judge), who was with him, translated the message and sent the list to Kan; Sultan's letter was read in Turkic (to persons) who were with him (Bereke). They (Tatars) rejoiced at this; he (Bereke) released the ambassadors with his answer and sent his ambassadors with him.

Thus, the secretary of the Egyptian sultan personally assures that the environment (divan) of King Bereke met the Turkic speech of the Egyptian ruler very joyfully. It was their native language.

Scheme of the rulers of the Kalmyk Khanate on the Volga

The memoirs of another Arab historian, Ibn Vasil, who died in 1297 in the city of Khams, where he held the position of chief qadi, judge, are also interesting. About the battle of the Tatars of King Bereke, as the Arab historian calls them, with the Mongols (Hulagu army) on the banks of the river. Kury, writes the following: “When Bereke arrived at the place of the battle and saw a terrible beating, he said: “May Allah put Khalavun to shame this one who killed the Mongols with the swords of the Mongols! If we acted together, we would conquer the whole earth.

Battle between Bereke Khan and Hulagu Khan in 1262

Here is how the Venetian Marco Polo describes this battle on the Terek River in 1262 between the troops of Bereke Khan (Golden Horde) and the Iranian Hulagu Khan several decades later, apparently from the words of eyewitnesses: “Arrows fly from both sides and after a while air so filled with them that the sky could not be seen. One could see how many people fell to the ground, and how many horses as well; and you must believe it: it could not be otherwise, so many arrows were fired at once. They did not stop shooting arrows until the arrows were in the quiver, and the whole earth was covered with dead and mortally wounded. And when they have used up all the arrows, they grabbed swords and clubs, run at each other and give out strong blows. The battle began, angry and cruel. It was a pity to watch. One could see how hands and heads were cut off; dead horses and people lay on the ground; many died; in a bad hour this battle began; just a pity! No other battle has killed as many as here. The screams and noise was such that the thunder of God could not be heard. I tell you, in truth, I had to walk on dead bodies; the whole earth was covered with them and turned crimson from blood. In truth, I will tell you, there has not been a battle for a long time where so many people would die as here. Such was the cry here, and such was the cry of those who fell to the ground mortally wounded and could not rise. It was just a shame to watch! In a bad hour, a battle began for both sides. Many wives became widows and many children became orphans. They showed that they do not wish good to each other and that they are mortal enemies.

And it only remains for me to add that it was the Turks who fought with each other, both on the one side and on the other. Only under different banners. And these troops were led by cousins. Both were grandchildren of Genghis Khan.

In this case, Bereke Khan himself (1256–1266), the ruler of the Golden Horde, calls his own army and the army of the enemy, the Iraqi Hulagu Khan (1258–1265), the Mongols, which is historically correct. They, the grandchildren of Genghis Khan, come from the Mongol Empire.

One of the characteristic battles of the Turkic warriors who fought among themselves, but under different banners and for the glory of their commanders who served different sovereigns, can be called the famous battle of Ain Jalut in 1260, when the valiant Mamluks stopped the further advance of Hulagu Khan's troops to the East.

Mamluks are the cavalry troops of the Egyptian Sultan, recruited from former slaves of Turkic origin. As a result of the invasion of the Mongols into the Great Steppe, the slave markets of the East began to be abundantly replenished with live goods. Young men of Turkic blood were in special demand. They were already excellent horsemen and archers. Therefore, the rulers of the emirates willingly bought them for personal protection and their troops. During the reign of al-Salih, the Turks began to be recruited into the Egyptian army in large numbers. Moreover, according to Sharia, a Muslim could not be sold into slavery. Therefore, "kafirs" were bought, that is, those who did not profess Islam. Such Turks lived only in the Eurasian steppes, where Islam had not yet penetrated. The training of soldiers lasted for several years. They chose the military path out of vocation and inclination of the heart. The income of a warrior depended on the position. Privates received from one and a half to two and a half thousand dinars, and the main emirs earned up to two hundred thousand dinars. Depending on merit, officers were promoted in rank. Concerned about the future of the country, the Sultan gave an allowance for babies born in Mamluk families.

Soldiers-veterans were paid a pension, and the state delivered koumiss, meat, cheese, butter, bread, wax and sugar to their families free of charge. All this was brought daily. When they converted to Islam, they were allowed to keep their Turkic names. Many of them, even when they became emirs or governors of regions, did not know Arabic, spoke only Turkic.

“According to the results of research by specialists, all 160 names of the Mamluk sultans, emirs and atabeks preserved in the historical memory are of Turkic origin. According to the Egyptian scholar Amin al-Kholi: "Almost all or most of the Mamluks were Kipchaks." Almost all, because in addition to the Kipchaks, among the Mamluks there were Oghuz Turks, represented by Turkmens, and other Turks - not Kipchaks.

One of these Mamluks, who reached the heights of power in Egypt, was al-Melik az-Zahir Ruknad-Din Baibars Bundukari.

On September 3, 1260, in the town of Ain Jalut in the vicinity of the Palestinian city of Nazareth, two armies converged: a forty-thousand Mamluk army led by Sultan Kutuz, emirs Baybars and Bahadur. The troops of the Mongols were led by the noyon of Ketbuga. At sunset, the Mongols suffered a crushing defeat. The victory of the Egyptian Mamluks stopped the expansion of the Mongols into the Muslim world.

Other Arab historians, for example, Rukn ad-din Baibars and an Nuvayri write that the message of Khan Tuda-Mengu (1280-1287) to the Egyptian sultan was written in Mongolian. But there is no evidence for this. Voiceless statement.

Even if we assume that these historians held in their hands a letter from the Mongols, written in an unfamiliar Uighur script, then, therefore, it is written in Mongolian. And all subsequent historians repeat this version.

The author of the study “Mamluks” (Almaty, 2004) writes: “Many researchers believe that the language of communication of the Mamluks of Egypt was the Western Kipchak language, which is confirmed by historical facts. These are, first of all, dictionaries and glossaries of the Mamluk language, compiled in the 11th-15th centuries. in Cairo. There is no doubt that "Atufhat-uz-Zakia" was written in Egypt, where Turkic was adopted as the state-administrative language, both in the army and at the court.

A more detailed consideration of this issue is devoted to the chapter X-X, the starting point.

In preparing this edition for publication, I drew attention to an article on the Internet by the well-known Mongolian scholar T.D. Skrynnikova. Mongols and Genghis Khan. The article, written in a purely scientific language, constructs the Mongolian identity in the era of Genghis Khan. The author points out that even the power elite in the newly created Empire was a multi-ethnic society. “The multidirectional vectors of ethno-cultural and socio-political interaction as a result of the activities of Genghis Khan led to the formation of a super-complex organizational structure and, accordingly, a multi-level system of identification preferences. This hierarchy of identities did not exclude one another, but only testified to the multidimensionality of the processes of identification, both external and internal (self-identification), and in this system different subjects of socio-political practices turn out to be Mongols at different times.

Here, the Chinese tradition is clearly traced, when the leader - the winner determines a new name for his people, his dynasty. Somewhat earlier, four hundred years ago (1206), we observed similar actions in Genghis Khan, when he gave a new name to his people and his country.

“There is no phoneme C in the phonetics of the Turks, therefore the phonetically correct name of the country in the Chagatai language sounds “Chin”, in the Kazakh transcription “Shin”. Literally means "top". Here we observe the identical origin of the name of the state Chin and the common name of the Shaker, Genghis Khan, that is, the commander who reached the heights in conquest and the unification of nomads into one empire. The terms of the Turkic language "chin" and "shin" carry the meanings of the word "great". Europeans still call the Chinese by this name ”(according to B. Umiryaev).

Regarding the Mongol-speaking Tatars, which some historians continue to stubbornly repeat, then, I believe, they were authoritatively objected by a Turkologist of the first magnitude, Professor S.G. Klyashtorny, referring to the chronicle of Rashid ad-Din: “The idea of ​​the ancient Tatars as a single Mongol-speaking people who lived in the VIII-XIII centuries. in eastern Mongolia are far from accurate. The Orkhon inscriptions first write about Otuz Tatars"thirty Tatars", and then about tokuz tatars"nine Tatars", that is, about huge and unstable tribal communities. Rashid ad-Din generally denies any unity of the Tatars in the past and present (i.e., in the 13th century), talks about the enmity and constant wars of the Tatar tribes among themselves, mentions that before the Mongol conquests there were six separate Tatar states, but in general, many Turkic tribes were then called Tatars. Which once again confirms that the Tatars who lived in Mongolia in the era of Genghis Khan, like all other Tatars, spoke their Tatar (Turkic) language, understandable to the Khitan, Kireits, Merkits, Naimans, Jalairs, Taydzhuits and other steppe nomads.

Historian-turkologist S.G. Klyashtorny wrote about the features and commonality of the nomadic Turkic-speaking tribes: “A common feature of the Turkic-speaking tribal associations of antiquity and the Middle Ages was their instability, mobility, and the ability to easily adapt as part of newly emerging tribal groups.” And what is not unimportant, we can add, they united around an authoritative successful leader-khan. As the Chinese leader Deng Xiao-ping said: “It doesn’t matter what color the cat is, as long as it catches mice well.” Genghis Khan lived up to this Chinese proverb. He has always been lucky. And obeying a successful leader, everyone received their equal share in the booty - a rarity. Nomads by whole clans, and then by tribes, joined the leader of the Borgegins.

From the book Autocrat of the Desert [Edition 2010] author Yuzefovich Leonid

Mongolian mirage 1 Przhevalsky compared the life of the Mongolian nomads, who once conquered half the world, with an extinct hearth in a yurt. Later, one of the Russian witnesses to the awakening of the descendants of Genghis Khan and Khubilai noted that the great traveler was mistaken, as an accidental

From the book History of the Middle Ages author

MONGOLIAN STORM And I looked, and here is a pale horse and on it a rider whose name is death, and hell followed him ... Apocalypse, XI.8. It is difficult for peaceful people living in cities and villages to understand the life of the steppes, where a person is inseparable from a horse and a saber, where horses are decorated with blankets made of

From the book Invasion. Harsh Laws author Maksimov Albert Vasilievich

TURKIC-MONGOLOID TALES The very origin of the Avars (on TV) should give them Mongoloid racial characteristics. But with this, the scientists had a bad luck. Remember the story of Gerasimov's restoration of the appearance of Tamerlane. Well, the Mongol Tamerlane did not turn out to look like a Mongol,

From the book Lev Gumilyov: Fate and Ideas author Lavrov Sergey Borisovich

10.2. Occupation or symbiosis? The Golden Horde was an artificial and fragile state association. After the conquests, accompanied by monstrous destruction and loss of life, the main goal of the Golden Horde rulers was to rob the enslaved

From the book History of Modern Times. Renaissance author Nefedov Sergey Alexandrovich

MONGOLIAN ORDER Although you received the Celestial Empire while sitting on a horse, you cannot rule it while sitting on a horse. Yelu Chu-tsai. Shortly before his death, Genghis Khan divided the whole world between his sons - the conquered regions and all the other countries that he bequeathed to conquer. Land on

From the book Legion "Idel-Ural" author Gilyazov Iskander Ayazovich

National Committees and the "Union of Struggle of the Turko-Tatars of Idel-Ural" Probably, it would be superfluous to mention that Hitler's Germany in the first years of the war did not need any representation of the peoples of the USSR. This would mean recognizing them as political partners, allies and

From the book People, Gods, Beasts author Ossendovsky Anthony Ferdinand

Mongolian condottiere Pre-revolutionary Mongolia was divided into western and eastern aimags. The administrative center of the first was Ulyasutay, which was ruled by a Chinese governor. Uliasutai did not at all resemble a city in the European sense of the word. on the trampled

author Niederle Lubor

Turko-Tatar Bulgarians and Slavs In accordance with the above point of view regarding the invasion of the Slavs to the Balkan Peninsula, the Slavs began to populate its eastern part in the 6th century. Although there is no definite and reliable information on this score, nevertheless, otherwise

From the book Slavic Antiquities author Niederle Lubor

Turko-Tatars There is no historical evidence that, along with the Scythians, Sarmatians and Finns, the Turko-Tatar tribes also became neighbors of the Slavs in ancient times. However, J. Peisker and prof. Korsh on the basis of only a few similar words in both languages, common to all

author Rakhmanaliev Rustan

Conflicts between the Turkic-Muslim states in the XI century. At the end of the first millennium of the Christian era, the question arose whether the union of the Turks and Islam, which took place so brilliantly among the Karakhanids, would lead to the spread of Islam to China or, on the contrary, to the west,

From the book Empire of the Turks. great civilization author Rakhmanaliev Rustan

Turkic-Mongolian peoples in the twelfth century

From the book Empire of the Turks. great civilization author Rakhmanaliev Rustan

The offensive of the Turkic-Mongols in the Caucasus and Iran. The invasion of the territory of Rus' Before following Genghis Khan on his last campaign in China, let us dwell on the expeditions of two military leaders, the best strategists in the Mongolian army - Jebe-noyon and Subetei-baatur,

From the book Jews and Eurasia author Bromberg Yakov Abramovich

Avigdor Eskin. Russian-Jewish symbiosis of our days Shortly after leaving the post of chief of the Israeli General Staff in 1983, Refael Eitan gave an interview to Israeli radio and spoke about his musical tastes. “Most of all I like to listen to the marches of the Red Army Ensemble, -

From the book Will Democracy Take root in Russia author Yasin Evgeny Grigorievich

10. 1. Bureaucracy and business: symbiosis and conflicts Recently, so much has been written and said about the relationship between business and government that it seems impossible to say anything new. Nevertheless, to complete the picture of the strengthening of the state and the curtailment of democracy in Putin's

From the book Historical Sketch of Buddhism and Islam in Afghanistan author Berzin Alexander

In the old days there was no means of transportation faster and more convenient horse . On a horse they transported goods, hunted, fought; on a horse they went to woo and brought the bride to the house. Without a horse, they could not imagine farming. A delicious and healing drink, koumiss, was obtained (and is still being received) from mare's milk, strong ropes were made from the hair of the mane, and soles for shoes were made from the skin, boxes and buckles were made from the horn coating of hooves. In a horse, especially in a horse, his position was valued. There were even signs by which you can recognize a good horse. The Kalmyks, for example, had 33 such signs.

The peoples that will be discussed, whether Turkic or Mongolian, know, love and breed this animal in their household. Perhaps their ancestors were not the first to domesticate the horse, but perhaps there are no peoples on earth in whose history the horse would play such a big role. Thanks to the light cavalry, the ancient Turks and Mongols settled on a vast territory - the steppe and forest-steppe, desert and semi-desert spaces of Central Asia and Eastern Europe.

On the globe about 40 peoples live in different countries speaking in Turkic languages ; more than 20 -in Russia. Their number is about 10 million people. Only 11 out of 20 have republics in their composition Russian Federation: Tatars (Republic of Tatarstan), Bashkirs (Republic of Bashkortostan), Chuvash (Chuvash Republic), Altaians (Altai Republic), Tuvans (Republic of Tuva), Khakass (The Republic of Khakassia), Yakuts (The Republic of Sakha (Yakutia)); among Karachays with Circassians and Balkars with Kabardians - common republics(Karachay-Cherkess and Kabardino-Balkarian).

The rest of the Turkic peoples are scattered throughout Russia, in its European and Asian regions and regions. it Dolgans, Shors, Tofalars, Chulyms, Nagaibaks, Kumyks, Nogais, Astrakhan and Siberian Tatars . The list can include Azerbaijanis (Derbent Turks) Dagestan, Crimean Tatars, Meskhetian Turks, Karaites, a significant number of whom now live not in their original land, in the Crimea and Transcaucasia, but in Russia.

The largest Turkic people of Russia - Tatars, there are about 6 million people. The smallest - Chulyms and Tofalars: the number of each nation is just over 700 people. northernmost - Dolgans on the Taimyr Peninsula, and southernmost - Kumyks in Dagestan, one of the republics North Caucasus.The most eastern Turks of Russia - Yakuts(their self-name - Sakha), and they live in the north-east of Siberia. BUT most western - Karachays inhabiting the southern regions of Karachay-Cherkessia. The Turks of Russia live in different geographical zones - in the mountains, in the steppe, in the tundra, in the taiga, in the forest-steppe zone.

The ancestral home of the Turkic peoples is the steppes of Central Asia. Starting from the II century. and ending in the 13th century, pressed by their neighbors, they gradually moved to the territory of present-day Russia and occupied the lands where their descendants now live (see the article "From primitive tribes to modern peoples").

The languages ​​of these peoples are similar, they have many common words, but, most importantly, the grammar is similar. As scientists suggest, in ancient times they were dialects of the same language. Over time, the closeness was lost. The Turks settled on a very large area, stopped communicating with each other, they had new neighbors, and their languages ​​could not help but influence the Turkic ones. All Turks understand each other, but, say, Altaians with Tuvans and Khakasses, Nogais with Balkars and Karachays, Tatars with Bashkirs and Kumyks can easily come to an agreement. And only the Chuvash language stands apart in the Turkic family of languages.

Representatives of the Turkic peoples of Russia differ greatly in appearance. . in the east this is North Asian and Central Asian Mongoloids -Yakuts, Tuvans, Altaians, Khakasses, Shors.In the west, typical Caucasians -Karachays, Balkars. And finally, the intermediate type refers in general caucasoid , but with a strong admixture of Mongoloid features Tatars, Bashkirs, Chuvashs, Kumyks, Nogais.

What's the matter here? The relationship of the Turks is more linguistic than genetic. Turkic languages are easy to pronounce, their grammar is very logical, there are almost no exceptions. In ancient times, nomadic Turks spread over a vast territory occupied by other tribes. Some of these tribes switched to the Turkic dialect because of its simplicity and over time began to feel like Turks, although they differed from them both in appearance and in traditional occupations.

Traditional farming , which the Turkic peoples of Russia were engaged in in the past, and in some places they continue to be engaged in now, are also diverse. Nearly all were grown cereals and vegetables. Many raised cattle: horses, sheep, cows. Excellent herdsmen have long been Tatars, Bashkirs, Tuvans, Yakuts, Altaians, Balkars. However deer bred and still few are bred. it Dolgans, northern Yakuts, Tofalars, Altaians and a small group of Tuvans living in the taiga part of Tuva - Todzha.

Religions among the Turkic peoples too various. Tatars, Bashkirs, Karachays, Nogais, Balkars, Kumyks - Muslims ; Tuvans - Buddhists . Altaians, Shors, Yakuts, Chulyms, although adopted in the XVII-XVIII centuries. Christianity , always remained secret worshipers of shamanism . Chuvash With mid-eighteenth in. considered the most Christian people in the Volga region , but in recent years some of them return to paganism : they worship the sun, the moon, the spirits of the earth and the dwelling, the spirits-ancestors, without refusing, however, from orthodoxy .

WHO ARE YOU, T A T A R Y?

Tatars - the most numerous Turkic people of Russia. They live in Republic of Tatarstan, as well as in Bashkortostan, Udmurt Republic and adjacent areas Ural and Volga regions. There are large Tatar communities in Moscow, St. Petersburg and other major cities. And in general, in all regions of Russia, one can meet Tatars who have been living outside their homeland, the Volga region, for decades. They have taken root in a new place, fit into a new environment for them, feel great there and do not want to leave anywhere.

There are several peoples in Russia who call themselves Tatars . Astrakhan Tatars live close to Astrakhan, Siberian- in Western Siberia, Kasimov Tatars - near the city of Kasimov on the river Ok a (on the territory where serving Tatar princes lived several centuries ago). And finally Kazan Tatars named after the capital of Tatarstan - the city of Kazan. All these are different, although close to each other peoples. However just Tatars should be called only Kazan .

Among the Tatars distinguish two ethnographic groups - Mishari Tatars and Kryashen Tatars . The former are known for being Muslims do not celebrate the national holiday Sabantuy but they celebrate red egg day - something similar to the Orthodox Easter. On this day, children collect colored eggs from home and play with them. Kryashens ("baptized") because they are called that because they were baptized, that is, they accepted Christianity, and note not Muslim but Christian holidays .

The Tatars themselves began to call themselves that way quite late - only in the middle of the 19th century. For a very long time they did not like this name and considered it humiliating. Until the 19th century they were named differently: Bulgarly" (Bulgars), "Kazanly" (Kazan), "Meselman" (Muslims). And now many demand the return of the name "Bulgars".

Turks came to the regions of the Middle Volga and the Kama region from the steppes of Central Asia and the North Caucasus, crowded by tribes that moved from Asia to Europe. The migration continued for several centuries. At the end of the IX-X centuries. a prosperous state, the Volga Bulgaria, arose on the Middle Volga. The people living in this state were called Bulgars. Volga Bulgaria existed for two and a half centuries. Here agriculture and cattle breeding, handicrafts developed, there was trade with Russia and with the countries of Europe and Asia.

O high level Bulgar culture in that period is evidenced by the existence of two types of writing - ancient Turkic runic(1) and later Arabic which came along with Islam in the 10th century. Arabic language and writing gradually replaced the signs of ancient Turkic writing from the sphere of public circulation. And this is natural: the entire Muslim East, with which Bulgaria had close political and economic contacts, used the Arabic language.

The names of remarkable poets, philosophers, scientists of Bulgaria, whose works are included in the treasury of the peoples of the East, have survived to our time. it Khoja Ahmed Bulgari (XI century) - a scientist and theologian, an expert on the moral precepts of Islam; FROM ulaiman ibn Daoud al-Saksini-Suwari (XII century) - the author of philosophical treatises with very poetic titles: "The light of the rays - the truthfulness of secrets", "The flower of the garden, delighting sick souls." And the poet Kul Gali (XII-XIII centuries) wrote the "Poem about Yusuf", which is considered a classic Turkic-language work of art of the pre-Mongolian period.

In the middle of the XIII century. Volga Bulgaria was conquered by the Tatar-Mongols and became part of the Golden Horde . After the fall of the Horde in 15th century . a new state arises in the Middle Volga region - Kazan Khanate . The main backbone of its population is formed by the same Bulgars, who by that time had already experienced the strong influence of their neighbors - the Finno-Ugric peoples (Mordovians, Mari, Udmurts), who lived next to them in the Volga basin, as well as the Mongols, who made up the majority ruling class Golden Horde.

Where did the name come from "Tatars" ? There are several versions of this. According to the most widespread, one of the Central Asian tribes conquered by the Mongols was called " tatan", "tatabi". In Rus', this word turned into "Tatars", and they began to call everyone: the Mongols, and the Turkic population of the Golden Horde subject to the Mongols, far from being monoethnic in composition. With the collapse of the Horde, the word "Tatars" did not disappear, they continued to collectively call the Turkic-speaking peoples on the southern and eastern borders of Rus'. Over time, its meaning narrowed down to the name of one people who lived on the territory of the Kazan Khanate.

The Khanate was conquered by Russian troops in 1552 . Since then, the Tatar lands have been part of Russia, and the history of the Tatars has been developing in close cooperation with the peoples inhabiting the Russian state.

Tatars excelled in various types of economic activity. They were wonderful s farmers (they grew rye, barley, millet, peas, lentils) and excellent cattle breeders . Of all types of livestock, sheep and horses were especially preferred.

Tatars were famous as beautiful artisans . Coopers made barrels for fish, caviar, sour, pickles, beer. Tanners made leather. Kazan morocco and Bulgar yuft (original locally produced leather), shoes and boots, very soft to the touch, decorated with applique from pieces of multi-colored leather, were especially valued at fairs. Among the Kazan Tatars there were many enterprising and successful merchants who traded throughout Russia.

TATAR NATIONAL CUISINE

In Tatar cuisine one can distinguish "agricultural" dishes and "cattle-breeding" dishes. The first ones are soups with pieces of dough, cereals, pancakes, tortillas , i.e., what can be prepared from grain and flour. To the second - dried horse meat sausage, sour cream, different types of cheese , a special kind of sour milk - katyk . And if you dilute the katyk with water and cool it, you get a wonderful thirst-quenching drink - ayran . well and belyashi - round pies fried in oil with meat or vegetable filling, which can be seen through a hole in the dough, are known to everyone. festive dish the Tatars considered smoked goose .

Already at the beginning of the X century. the ancestors of the Tatars accepted Islam , and since then their culture has developed within the Islamic world. This was facilitated by the spread of writing based on Arabic script and the construction of a large number of mosques - buildings for holding collective prayers. Schools were created at mosques - mektebe and madrasah , where children (and not only from noble families) learned to read the holy book of Muslims in Arabic - Koran .

Ten centuries of written tradition have not been in vain. Among the Kazan Tatars, in comparison with other Turkic peoples of Russia, there are many writers, poets, composers, and artists. Often it was the Tatars who were the mullahs and teachers of other Turkic peoples. Tatars have a highly developed sense of national identity, pride in their history and culture.

{1 } Runic (from the ancient Germanic and Gothic runa - "mystery*") is the name given to the most ancient Germanic writings, which were distinguished by a special inscription of characters. The ancient Turkic writing of the 8th-10th centuries was also called.

VISIT TO X A K A S A M

In southern Siberia on the banks of the Yenisei River another Turkic-speaking people lives - Khakass . There are only 79 thousand of them. Khakasses - descendants of the Yenisei Kyrgyz who lived more than a thousand years ago in the same area. Neighbors, the Chinese, called the Kyrgyz " hyagas"; from this word the name of the people came - the Khakass. By appearance Khakasses can be attributed to Mongoloid race, however, a strong Caucasoid admixture is also noticeable in them, which manifests itself in lighter skin than other Mongoloids and lighter, sometimes almost red, hair color.

Khakasses live in Minusinsk basin, sandwiched between the Sayan and Abakan ridges. They consider themselves mountain people , although the majority live in the flat, steppe part of Khakassia. Archaeological monuments of this basin - and there are more than 30 thousand of them - testify that a person lived on the Khakas land already 40-30 thousand years ago. From the drawings on the rocks and stones, one can get an idea of ​​how people lived at that time, what they did, who they hunted, what rituals they performed, what gods they worshiped. Of course, it cannot be said that Khakass{2 ) are direct descendants of the ancient inhabitants of these places, but there are still some common features between the ancient and modern population of the Minusinsk Basin.

Khakass - pastoralists . They call themselves " threefold people", because three types of livestock are bred: horses, cattle (cows and bulls) and sheep . Previously, if a person had more than 100 horses and cows, they said about him that he had "a lot of cattle", and they called him a bai. In the XVIII-XIX centuries. The Khakass led a nomadic lifestyle. Cattle were grazed all year round. When horses, sheep, cows ate all the grass around the dwelling, the owners collected property, loaded it onto horses and, together with their herd, went to a new place. Having found a good pasture, they set up a yurt there and lived until the cattle again ate the grass. And so on until four times in year.

Bread they also sowed - and learned this a long time ago. An interesting folk way, which determined the readiness of the land for sowing. The owner plowed small plot and, having exposed the lower half of the body, sat down on the arable land to smoke a pipe. If, while he was smoking, the bare parts of the body did not freeze, it means that the earth has warmed up and it is possible to sow grain. However, other nations also used this method. While working on arable land, they did not wash their faces - so as not to wash away happiness. And when the sowing was over, they made an alcoholic drink from the remnants of last year's grain and sprinkled the sown land with it. This interesting Khakass rite was called "Uren Khurty", which means "to kill an earthworm". It was performed in order to appease the spirit - the owner of the earth, so that he would not "allow" various kinds of pests to destroy the future crop.

Now the Khakass quite willingly eat fish, but in the Middle Ages they were treated with disgust and called it "river worm". To prevent it from accidentally getting into drinking water, special channels were diverted from the river.

Until the middle of the XIX century. Khakass lived in yurts . Yurt- comfortable nomadic dwelling. It can be assembled and disassembled in two hours. First, sliding wooden grates are placed in a circle, a door frame is attached to them, then a dome is laid out from separate poles, while not forgetting about the upper hole: it plays the role of a window and a chimney at the same time. In summer, the outside of the yurt was covered with birch bark, and in winter - with felt. If you properly heat the hearth, which is placed in the center of the yurt, then it is very warm in it in any frost.

Like all pastoralists, the Khakass love meat and dairy products . With the onset of winter colds, cattle were slaughtered for meat - not all, of course, but as much as needed to last until the beginning of summer, until the first milk of cows that went out to pasture. Horses and sheep were slaughtered according to certain rules, dismembering the carcass at the joints with a knife. It was forbidden to break bones - otherwise the owner will have cattle transferred and there will be no happiness. On the day of the slaughter, a celebration was held and all the neighbors were invited. Adults and children are very loved pressed milk foam mixed with flour, bird cherry or lingonberries .

There have always been many children in Khakas families. There is a proverb "A man who has raised cattle has a full stomach, and a man who has raised children has a full soul"; If a woman gave birth and raised nine children - and the number nine had a special meaning in the mythology of many peoples of Central Asia - she was allowed to ride a "consecrated" horse. The horse, on which the shaman performed a special ceremony, was considered consecrated; after him, according to the beliefs of the Khakas, the horse was protected from trouble and protected the entire herd. Not every man was even allowed to touch such an animal.

In general, the Khakass many interesting customs . For example, a person who managed to catch the sacred bird flamingo while hunting (this bird is very rare in Khakassia) could woo any girl, and her parents had no right to refuse him. The groom dressed the bird in a red silk shirt, tied a red silk scarf around its neck and carried it as a gift to the bride's parents. Such a gift was considered very valuable, more expensive than any kalym - a ransom for the bride, which the groom had to pay to her family.

Since the 90s. 20th century Khakass - by religion they shamanists - annually celebrate the national holiday Ada Hoorai . It is dedicated to the memory of the ancestors - everyone who has ever fought and died for the freedom of Khakassia. In honor of these heroes, a public prayer is held, a ritual of sacrifice is performed.

THROAT SINGING OF THE KHAKAS

Khakasses own the art of throat singing . It's called " hai ". The singer does not utter words, but in the low and high sounds flying out of his throat, one hears the sounds of an orchestra, then the rhythmic clatter of a horse's hooves, then the hoarse groans of a dying beast. Undoubtedly, this unusual view art was born in nomadic conditions, and its origins must be sought in ancient times. It's curious that throat singing is known only to the Turkic-speaking peoples - Tuvans, Khakasses, Bashkirs, Yakuts - and also to a small extent to the Buryats and Western Mongols, in which there is a strong admixture of Turkic blood. It is unknown to other nations. And this is one of the mysteries of nature and history, not yet revealed by scientists. Throat singing is only for men . You can learn it by training hard from childhood, and since far from everyone has enough patience, only a few achieve success.

{2 ) Before the revolution, the Khakasses were called Minusinsk or Abakan Tatars.

ON THE CHULYM RIVER UCHULYMTS EV

On the border of the Tomsk region and the Krasnoyarsk Territory in the Chulym river basin lives the smallest Turkic people in terms of numbers - Chulyms . Sometimes they are called Chulym Turks . But they talk about themselves "Pestyn Kizhiler", which means "our people". At the end of the 19th century there were about 5 thousand people, now there are just over 700. Small peoples living next to large ones usually merge with the latter, perceive their culture, language and self-consciousness. the neighbors of the Chulyms were Siberian Tatars, Khakasses, and from the 17th century - Russians who began to move here from the central regions of Russia. Some of the Chulyms merged with the Siberian Tatars, others merged with the Khakass, and others with the Russians. Those who still continue to call themselves Chulyms, almost lost their native language.

Chulyms - fishermen and hunters . At the same time, they catch fish mainly in the summer, and hunt mainly in the winter, although, of course, they know both winter ice fishing and summer hunting.

Fish was stored and eaten in any form: raw, boiled, dried with and without salt, crushed with wild roots, fried on a spit, mashed caviar. Sometimes the fish was cooked by placing the skewer at an angle to the fire so that the fat flowed out and it dried out a little, after which it was dried in an oven or in special closed pits. Frozen fish was mainly for sale.

Hunting was divided into hunting "for oneself" and hunting "for sale". ". For themselves they beat - and continue to do so now - elk, taiga and lake game, put snares on squirrels. Elk and game are indispensable in the food of the Chulyms. Sable, fox and wolf were hunted for the sake of fur skins: Russian merchants paid well for them. Bear meat was eaten themselves, and the skin was most often sold to buy guns and cartridges, salt and sugar, knives and clothing.

Still Chulyms are engaged in such an ancient activity as gathering: wild herbs, garlic and onions, wild dill are collected in the taiga, in the floodplain, along the banks of lakes, dried or salted, and added to food in autumn, winter and spring. These are the only vitamins available to them. In autumn, like many other peoples of Siberia, the Chulyms go out with their whole families to collect pine nuts.

Chulyms knew how make cloth out of nettles . Nettles were collected, tied into sheaves, dried in the sun, then kneaded with hands and crushed in a wooden mortar. All this was done by children. And the yarn itself from cooked nettles was made by adult women.

On the example of Tatars, Khakasses and Chulyms, one can see how the Turkic peoples of Russia are distinguished- in appearance, type of economy, spiritual culture. Tatars outwardly most similar on Europeans, Khakasses and Chulyms - typical Mongoloids with only a slight admixture of Caucasoid features.Tatars - settled farmers and pastoralists , Khakass -pastoral nomads in the recent past , Chulyms - fishermen, hunters, gatherers .Tatars - Muslims , Khakasses and Chulyms once accepted Christianity , and now return to the ancient shamanic cults. So the Turkic world is both united and diverse at the same time.

CLOSE RELATIVES OF BURYATY AND KALMYKI

If a Turkic peoples in Russia more than twenty Mongolian - only two: Buryats and Kalmyks . Buryats live in Southern Siberia on the lands adjacent to Lake Baikal, and further to the east . In administrative terms, this is the territory of the Republic of Buryatia (the capital is Ulan-Ude) and two autonomous Buryat districts: Ust-Orda in Irkutsk region and Aginsky in Chita . Buryats also live in Moscow, St. Petersburg and in many other large cities of Russia . Their number is more than 417 thousand people.

The Buryats formed as a single people by the middle of the 17th century. from the tribes that lived on the lands around Lake Baikal more than a thousand years ago. In the second half of the XVII century. these territories became part of Russia.

Kalmyks live in Lower Volga region in the Republic of Kalmykia (capital - Elista) and neighboring Astrakhan, Rostov, Volgograd regions and Stavropol Territory . The number of Kalmyks is about 170 thousand people.

The history of the Kalmyk people began in Asia. His ancestors - Western Mongolian tribes and nationalities - were called Oirats. In the XIII century. they were united under the rule of Genghis Khan and, together with other peoples, formed the vast Mongol Empire. As part of the army of Genghis Khan, they participated in his campaigns of conquest, including those against Rus'.

After the collapse of the empire (late XIV - early XV centuries) into its former territory troubles and wars began. Part Oirat taishas (princes) subsequently asked for citizenship from the Russian tsar, and during the first half of the 17th century. in several groups they moved to Russia, in the steppes of the Lower Volga region. The word "Kalmyk" comes from the word halmg", which means "remnant". So they called themselves those who, having not converted to Islam, came from Dzungaria{3 ) to Russia, unlike those who continued to call themselves Oirats. And since the 18th century the word "Kalmyk" became the self-name of the people.

Since then, the history of the Kalmyks has been closely connected with the history of Russia. Their nomad camps protected its southern borders from sudden attacks by the Turkish Sultan and the Crimean Khan. The Kalmyk cavalry was famous for its speed, lightness, and excellent fighting qualities. She participated in almost all the wars waged by the Russian Empire: Russian-Turkish, Russian-Swedish, the Persian campaign of 1722-1723, the Patriotic War of 1812.

The fate of the Kalmyks as part of Russia was not easy. Two events were especially tragic. The first is the departure of a part of the princes dissatisfied with the policy of Russia, together with their subjects, back to Western Mongolia in 1771. The second is the deportation of the Kalmyk people to Siberia and Central Asia in 1944-1957. on charges of aiding the Germans during the Great Patriotic War 1941 - 1945 Both events left a heavy imprint in the memory and in the soul of the people.

Kalmyks and Buryats have a lot in common in culture , and not only because they speak close and understandable to each other languages ​​that are part of the Mongolian language group. The point is also different: both peoples up to the beginning of the 20th century. were engaged nomadic pastoralism ; in the past were shamanists , and later, although at different times (the Kalmyks in the 15th century, and the Buryats at the beginning of the 17th century), adopted Buddhism . Their culture combines shamanic and Buddhist features, rites of both religions coexist . There is nothing unusual about this. There are many peoples on earth who, officially considered Christians, Muslims, Buddhists, nevertheless continue to follow the pagan tradition.

Buryats and Kalmyks are also among such peoples. And although they have many Buddhist temples (before the 20s of the XX century, the Buryats had 48 of them, the Kalmyks - 104; now the Buryats have 28 temples, the Kalmyks - 14), but they celebrate traditional pre-Buddhist holidays with special solemnity. For the Buryats, this is Sagaalgan (White month) - New Year's holiday, which occurs on the first spring new moon. Now it is considered Buddhist, services are held in its honor in Buddhist temples, but, in fact, it was and remains a national holiday.

Every year, Sagaalgan is celebrated on different days, as the date is calculated from lunar calendar, not solar. This calendar is called the 12-year animal cycle, because each year in it bears the name of an animal (the year of the Tiger, the year of the Dragon, the year of the Hare, etc.) and the “named” year is repeated every 12 years. In 1998, for example, the year of the tiger began on February 27th.

When Sagaalgan comes, it is supposed to eat a lot of white, i.e. dairy, food - cottage cheese, butter, cheese, foam, drink milk vodka and koumiss. That is why the holiday is called "White month". Everything white in the culture of the Mongolian-speaking peoples was considered sacred and was directly related to holidays and solemn ceremonies: white felt, on which the newly elected khan was raised, a bowl with fresh, freshly milked milk, which was brought to the honored guest. The horse that won the race was sprinkled with milk.

But Kalmyks meet New Year December 25th and call it "dzul" , and the White month (in Kalmyk it is called "Tsagaan Sar") is considered by them as a holiday of the onset of spring and was not connected with the New Year in any way.

At the height of summer Buryats celebrate Surkharban . On this day top athletes compete in accuracy, shooting from a bow at felt balls - targets ("sur" - "felt ball", "harbakh" - "shoot"; hence the name of the holiday); horse races and national wrestling are arranged. Important point holiday - sacrifices to the spirits of the earth, water and mountains. If the spirits were appeased, the Buryats believed, they would send good weather, abundant grasses for pastures, which means that the cattle will be fat and well-fed, people will be full and satisfied with life.

Kalmyks have two similar holidays in summer: Usn Arshan (blessing of water) and Usn Tyaklgn (sacrifice to water). In the dry Kalmyk steppe, much depended on water, so it was necessary to make a sacrifice to the spirit of water in a timely manner in order to win its favor. At the end of autumn, each family performed the rite of sacrifice to fire - Gal Tyaklgn . A cold winter was approaching, and it was very important that the "owner" of the hearth and fire be kind to the family and provide warmth in the house, yurt, wagon. A ram was sacrificed, its meat was burned in the fire of the hearth.

Buryats and Kalmyks are extremely respectful and even affectionate towards the horse. This is one of the characteristic features of nomadic societies. Any poor man had several horses, the rich owned large herds, but, as a rule, each owner knew his horses "by sight", could distinguish them from strangers, and gave nicknames especially to his beloved. Heroes of all heroic legends (epos Buryat - "Geser ", Kalmyks - "Jangar ") had a beloved horse, which was called by name. He was not just a mount, but a friend and comrade in trouble, in joy, on a military campaign. battlefield, obtained "living water" to bring back to life. The horse and the nomad were attached to each other from childhood. If at the same time a boy was born in the family, and a foal in the herd, the parents gave him to his son at full disposal. They grew up together, the boy fed, watered and walked his friend. The foal learned to be a horse, and the boy - a rider. This is how the future winners of the races, dashing riders grew up. Short, hardy, with long manes, the Central Asian horses grazed in the steppe all year round on pasture. They were not afraid no cold weather, no wolves, fighting off predators with strong and accurate blows hooves. The excellent war cavalry more than once put the enemy to flight and caused amazement and respect both in Asia and in Europe.

"TROIKA" IN KALMYK

Kalmyk folklore surprisingly rich in genres - here and fairy tales, and legends, and the heroic epic "Dzhangar", and proverbs, and sayings, and riddles . There is also a peculiar genre that is difficult to define. It combines a riddle, a proverb and a saying and is called a "three line" or simply "troika" (no-Kalmyks - "gurvn"). The people believed that there were 99 such "threes"; in fact, there are probably many more. The youth loved to arrange competitions - who knows them more and better. Here is some of them.

Three of what is fast?
What is the fastest in the world? Horse legs.
An arrow, if it is dexterously thrown.
And thought is fast when it is smart.

Three of what is full?
In the month of May, the freedom of the steppes is full.
A child is fed, that is fed by his mother.
A well-fed old man who raised worthy children.

Three of those who are rich?
The old man, since there are many daughters and sons, is rich.
The skill of the master among the masters is rich.
The poor man, at least in that there are no debts, is rich.

In three lines, improvisation plays an important role. A participant in the competition can come up with his own "troika" right off the bat. The main thing is that the laws of the genre are observed in it: first there must be a question, and then an answer consisting of three parts. And, of course, meaning, worldly logic and folk wisdom are necessary.

{3 ) Dzungaria is a historical region on the territory of modern Northwest China.

TRADITIONAL BOOT COSTUME

Bashkirs , who for a long time maintained a semi-nomadic lifestyle, widely used leather, skins and wool for making clothes. Underwear was sewn from Central Asian or Russian factory fabrics. Those who early switched to a sedentary lifestyle made clothes from nettle, hemp, linen canvas.

Traditional male costume consisted of shirts with a turn-down collar and wide trousers . Over the shirt they wore a short sleeveless jacket and going out into the street caftan with a standing collar or a long, almost straight dressing gown made of dark fabric . Know and mullahs went to dressing gowns made of motley Central Asian silk . In the cold time of the Bashkirs dressed in spacious cloth robes, sheepskin coats or sheepskin coats .

Skullcaps were everyday headwear for men. , in the elderly- dark velvet young- bright, embroidered with colored threads. They put on over skullcaps in the cold felt hats or cloth-covered fur hats . In the steppes, during snowstorms, warm fur malachai, which covered the back of the head and ears, saved.

The most common shoes were boots : the bottom was made of leather, and the leg was made of canvas or cloth fabrics. On holidays they were changed to leather boots . Met at the Bashkirs and bast sandals .

Woman suit included dress, bloomers and sleeveless jacket . The dresses were detachable, with a wide skirt, they were decorated with ribbons and braid. It was supposed to be worn over the dress short fitted sleeveless jackets, sheathed with braid, coins and plaques . Apron , which at first served as work clothes, later became part of the festive costume.

Headdresses varied. Women of all ages covered their heads with a scarf and tied it under their chin. . Some young Bashkirs under scarves wore small velvet caps embroidered with beads, pearls, corals , a elderly- quilted cotton hats. Sometimes married Bashkirs worn over a scarf high fur hats .

PEOPLE OF THE SUN RAYS (Y KU T Y)

The people, who in Russia are called Yakuts, call themselves "Sakha"." , and in myths and legends it is very poetic - "people of the sun's rays with reins behind their backs." Their number is more than 380 thousand people. They live in the north Siberia, in the basins of the Lena and Vilyui rivers, in the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia). Yakuts , the northernmost pastoralists of Russia, breed cattle and small cattle and horses. Kumys from mare's milk and smoked horse meat - favorite foods in summer and winter, on weekdays and holidays. In addition, the Yakuts are excellent fishermen and hunters . Fish are caught mainly with nets, which are now bought in a store, and in the old days they were woven from horsehair. They hunt in the taiga for a large animal, in the tundra - for game. Among the methods of extraction there is known only to the Yakuts - hunting with a bull. The hunter sneaks up on the prey, hiding behind the bull, and shoots at the beast.

Before meeting the Russians, the Yakuts almost did not know agriculture, they did not sow bread, did not grow vegetables, but they were engaged in gathering in the taiga : they harvested wild onions, edible herbs and the so-called pine sapwood - a layer of wood located directly under the bark. She was dried, crushed, turning into flour. In winter, it was the main source of vitamins that saved from scurvy. Pine flour was diluted in water, a mash was made, to which fish or milk was added, and if they were not, they ate it just like that. This dish has remained in the distant past, now its description can only be found in books.

The Yakuts live in a country of taiga paths and full-flowing rivers, and therefore their traditional means of transportation have always been a horse, a deer and a bull or a sleigh (the same animals were harnessed to them), boats made of birch bark or hollowed out from a tree trunk. And even now, in the age of airlines, railways, developed river and sea navigation, in the remote areas of the republic they travel the same way as in the old days.

The folk art of this people is surprisingly rich . The Yakuts were glorified far beyond the borders of their land by the heroic epic - olonkho - about the exploits of ancient heroes, wonderful women's jewelry and carved wooden goblets for koumiss - chorons , each of which has its own unique ornament.

The main holiday of the Yakuts - Ysyakh . It is celebrated on Konya June, on the days of the summer solstice. This is the holiday of the New Year, the holiday of the Revival of nature and the birth of a person - not a specific one, but a person in general. On this day, sacrifices are made to the gods and spirits, expecting patronage from them in all upcoming affairs.

RULES OF THE ROAD (YAKUT VARIANT)

Are you ready for the road? Be careful! Even if the path ahead of you is not very long and difficult, road rules must be observed. And each nation has its own.

The Yakuts had a rather long set of rules for "leaving home" , and everyone tried to observe it, who wanted his journey to be successful and he returned safely. Before leaving, they sat down in a place of honor in the house, facing the fire, and threw firewood into the stove - they fed the fire. It was not supposed to tie shoelaces on a hat, mittens, clothes. On the day of departure, the household did not rake the ashes in the oven. According to the beliefs of the Yakuts, ashes are a symbol of wealth and happiness. There is a lot of ashes in the house - it means that the family is rich, little - poor. If you scoop up the ashes on the day of departure, then the departing person will not be lucky in business, he will return with nothing. A girl getting married, when leaving her parents' house, should not look back, otherwise her happiness will remain in their house.

To keep everything in order, sacrifices were made to the "owner" of the road at crossroads, mountain passes, watersheds: they hung bundles of horse hair, shreds of matter torn from the dress, left copper coins, buttons.

On the road, it was forbidden to call the objects taken with them by their real names - it was supposed to resort to allegories. There was no need to talk about the upcoming actions along the way. Travelers who stop on the banks of the river never say that they will cross the river tomorrow - there is a special expression for this, translated from Yakut approximately like this: "Tomorrow we will try to ask our grandmother there."

According to the beliefs of the Yakuts, objects thrown or found on the road acquired a special magical power - good or evil. If a leather rope or a knife was found on the road, they were not taken, as they were considered "dangerous", but a horsehair rope, on the contrary, was a "happy" find, and they took it with them.

KHURAL KHURAL is the traditional name of the representative bodies of power in Mongolia, as well as a number of republics within the Russian Federation - Tyva, Buryatia.

Big legal dictionary. - M.: Infra-M. A. Ya. Sukharev, V. E. Krutskikh, A. Ya. Sukharev. 2003 .

Synonyms:

See what "KHURAL" is in other dictionaries:

    - (mong.) meeting of the people's representative and legislative body among the Mongolian and Turkic peoples: Kurultai Great State Khural of Mongolia People's Khural of the Republic of Buryatia People's Khural of the Republic of Kalmykia Supreme Khural ... ... Wikipedia

    - [mong.] in Mongolia: the name of the state and local authorities. Dictionary of foreign words. Komlev N.G., 2006. KHURUL, KHURAL (Mongolian collection). Buddhist temple; temple; as well as a worship service honoring the Buddha. Dictionary of foreign words included ... Dictionary of foreign words of the Russian language

    Khuruldan, parliament Dictionary of Russian synonyms. Khural n., number of synonyms: 2 parliament (42) ... Synonym dictionary

    And khuruldan, khurala, husband. (Mong. xural). The name of the elected bodies of supreme and local power in the Mongolian People's Republic. Explanatory Dictionary of Ushakov. D.N. Ushakov. 1935 1940 ... Explanatory Dictionary of Ushakov

    KHURAL, a, husband. In Mongolia: an elected body of the supreme and local authorities. Explanatory dictionary of Ozhegov. S.I. Ozhegov, N.Yu. Shvedova. 1949 1992 ... Explanatory dictionary of Ozhegov

    Khural- the name or element of the name of representative bodies in some states. For example, in Mongolia the concept of "X." designate the representative bodies of state power. Great People's X. Parliament, People's X. - elected ... Encyclopedia of Law

    KHURAL- the name of the representative authorities in Mongolia, and so on. in Tuva, Buryatia ... Legal Encyclopedia

    Name of state authorities in the Mongolian People's Republic. The highest body of state power Great People's Khural; state authorities in Aimaks, Somons, cities, bags (villages) are Kh. people ... ... Great Soviet Encyclopedia

    BUT; m. [mong. qural assembly]. In Mongolia: the name of the state authorities. * * * KHURAL KHURAL is the traditional name of representative bodies of power (see REPRESENTATIVE POWER) in Mongolia, Tuva, Buryatia, Kalmykia… encyclopedic Dictionary

    Or khurul, a Mongolian word that means the actual assembly, and then the assembly of clerics honoring some kind of Buddha, i.e. Buddhist worship. Among the Kalmyks, in the folk dialect, the word khurul also denotes the place of service, i.e. Buddhist ... ... Encyclopedic Dictionary F.A. Brockhaus and I.A. Efron

Books

  • Kingdom of lies. Enemy of the throne Book Two, Dmitry Garin. The first timid rays of hope for reconciliation between the two peoples broke through the clouds of hatred and distrust. The tribe of the faceless is involved in the maelstrom of political intrigues of the human world.…
  • Kingdom of lies. Enemy of the Throne, Garin D. The first timid ray of hope for reconciliation between the two peoples broke through the clouds of hatred and mistrust. The tribe of the faceless is involved in the maelstrom of political intrigues of the human world.…